Posted tagged ‘separation of church and state’

Neil deGrasse Tyson: Bible in Classroom

March 5, 2009

You tell ’em, Neil!


Your Medical Care Must Follow MY Religion

December 20, 2008

The Bush administration, with just a month left in office, has shot freedom in the nuts once again. On December 18th they passed the Provider Conscience Regulation which allows medical personnel to “refuse to participate in any practice they find morally objectionable”. So, medical personnel no longer have to be able or willing to do their jobs anymore. Anyone along the line can decide that your birth control, or your end of life plans, or your blood transfusion offends them and they can put an end to your plans. Yep, their religion is now your religion, believe in it or not. And remember, unlike groups like Jehovah’s Witness’ that are pleased to stay out of the aspects of life they don’t agree with, fundagelicals have no problem going out of their way to impose their beliefs on others. Hopefully this will be overturned once the gaurds are changed.

Gov’t Building Nativities: Don’t These People Have A Church?

December 19, 2008

You know, there has been a lot of attention about the nativity scene/atheist signs on the lawns of government buildings lately. It starts with a religious group or person petitioning to put up a nativity, then the ffrf puts up an atheist sign in rebuttal.  But, what I don’t get is this: don’t these people have churches? Can’t they put up their nativity there? Of course, it would be even better if they put them in their own lawn, but that would be far too logical.

I drove around town today and looked for nativity scenes (or any religious display) on church grounds. Out of 14 churches, only 2 of them have displays. So, why would people demand that government buildings have nativity scenes if churches aren’t even putting them up?

Religion in the Town Square

December 9, 2008

During this election season, the GOP kept touting emphatically that religion belongs in the “town square”. We don’t have a town square where I live, so I’m not sure what this means. If I were to take it literally, I would imagine a time before TV when, for entertainment, people would go to a local public gathering area and would watch someone speak about the issues of the day.
But, since we have books, tv, and the internet, people in today’s world don’t really do this. The have different and, in pretty much every way that I can imagine, better ways of getting information and entertainment.

Even though it’s antiquated, though, people are indeed free to go down to the local square, jump up on a stump and speak to the non-existent audience about religion or anything else that happens to be on their minds.  So, why were they demanding a right that they already have?

Based upon past performance, I suspect that religion “in town square” is actually a code word for something. Like the way “defense of marriage” was code for banning gay marriage. Or, “stimulating the economy” is code for tax breaks for the rich. It’s probably code for destroying separation of church and state. Why do they want to destroy separation of church and state? Dunno. They probably have some issue with their church that they want the government to regulate for them.

Why do they use code words? They’re probably embarrassed. Or, they’re afraid that if they actually said what they ment that no one would vote for them.